SETI public: Fw: detecting a real signal in overwhelming noise.

From: Ronald C. Blue (ron_at_u2ai.us)
Date: Mon Jun 23 2008 - 21:21:51 PDT

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Preliminary Program - Search for Life Signatures - Paris - Sept. 21-26, 2008"

    I posted this idea years ago. My friend liked it so I am forward it.

    Ron Blue

    > That's actually pretty brilliant. Have you sent this to SETI?
    > I would like to try something like this in hardware. I would think you
    > can detect quantum signals using the same process. I'm busy with lil
    > blue right now, trying to finish it up, but this would be a good
    > experiment to possibly detect visual patterns in the optics that maybe
    > we wouldn't detect but the machine would find useful. We need to keep
    > this in mind.........
    > Thanks!
    >
    >
    > Ronald C. Blue wrote:
    >>
    >>>
    >> To: <cvnet_at_mail.ewind.com>
    >> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 10:25 PM
    >> Subject: Re: CVNet - For SDT buffs
    >>
    >>
    >>> I suspect the nervous system is better than our models.
    >>>
    >>> SETI is interested in detecting a real signal in overwhelming noise.
    >>> This would also be true for the brain.
    >>>
    >>> I suggested the following approach may work for SETI and is common
    >>> practice for the brain.
    >>>
    >>> Three radio telescopes are focus on a star. One telescope slightly
    >>> to the left, one on the star, and one slightly to the right,
    >>> A group sample of 30 data points over a specific time internal or
    >>> consolidation cycle. The average and standard deviation is
    >>> calculated for each cycle. The average differnce of the two controls
    >>> would be used to filter any real data from the central telescope.
    >>> They would function as wavelet filters for signal recognition. The
    >>> consolidation cycle frequencty for the brain would be 100 hertz for
    >>> vision.
    >>>
    >>> A signal data point is created only when there is a statistically
    >>> significant difference between the central telescope and one of the
    >>> other telescopes. The false readings would averge out so that a real
    >>> frequency signal if present would emerge. Noise is actually
    >>> required to detect a weak signal.
    >>>
    >>> About 20 years ago I wrote a program to test the idea. A signal ...
    >>> sine wave was placed in as a seeded value in random noise - the
    >>> central telescope. The random noise from two other units were used
    >>> as a wavelet filter. The program ploted the difference and a sine
    >>> wave was visible even though it was hidden in noise.
    >>>
    >>> A chart would be like this:
    >>> 30 random number - 30 random number plus or minus seed value from
    >>> a sine wave - 30 random numbers
    >>> Mean and standard deviation of each sample calculated was compared
    >>> for statistical significance.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Ron Blue
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >


  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Preliminary Program - Search for Life Signatures - Paris - Sept. 21-26, 2008"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Jun 25 2008 - 07:39:41 PDT