SETI public: Blue stars around a black hole and the black hole no galaxy problem

• Previous message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: A Gravitational Tractor for Towing Planetoids"

The following may be related to explain how a black hole can exist without a galaxy. If electrons are one way strings attach to a 3D brane and a 7D brane then why not a larger particle that we call a black hole?

The model suggested that matter degrades, it is also possible that 7D branes degrade pumping energy into 3D branes which eventually becomes hydrogen in our universe. This could explain the large number of blue stars observed around one back hole. This in put of matter would make our 3D brane expand and accelerate over time. This also means that there was no big bang.

Ron Blue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
Number 745 September 15, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
                
WHY DO WE RESIDE IN A THREE-DIMENSIONAL UNIVERSE? Andreas Karch
(University of Washington) and Lisa Randall (Harvard) propose to
explain why we live in three dimensions and not some other number.
Currently, the popular string theory of matter holds that our
universe is actually ten-dimensional, including, first of all, the
dimension of time, then the three "large" dimensions we perceive as
"space," plus six more dimensions that are difficult to see, perhaps
because they are hidden in some way. There is reason to believe,
therefore, that our common 3D space is but a portion of some
membrane or "brane" within a much more complicated
higher-dimensional reality. Specifically, Karch and Randall
address themselves to the behavior of three-dimensional force laws,
including the force of gravity. Having several dimensions rolled up
is one way to explain why gravity if so weak. Another view,
pioneered by Randall and Raman Sundrum, holds that if gravity is
localized on a 3D defect in the larger multi-dimensional universe
and if spacetime is sufficiently warped, then the other spatial
dimensions might be large after all. But why is our "local gravity"
apparently a 3D defect in a 10D universe? Why not a 4D defect or
some other dimensionality? In the present paper, Karch
(karch_at_feynman.phys.washington.edu) and Randall show that the cosmic
evolution of the 10D universe, involving a steady dilution of
matter, results in spacetime being populated chiefly by 3D and 7D
branes. Several versions of string theories require the existence
of 3D and 7D branes; indeed, the particles that constitute
matter---such as quarks and electrons---can be considered open
strings with one end planted on a 3D brane and the other end planted
on a 7D brane. (Karch and Randall, Physical Review Letters,
upcoming article )

• Previous message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: A Gravitational Tractor for Towing Planetoids"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Sep 21 2005 - 16:54:45 UTC