Fw: SETI public: Lightening emissions: Xrays.

From: James Brown (jim_at_Seti.Net)
Date: Sat Mar 05 2005 - 18:42:42 PST

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Timothy Ferris on the contributions of multiple amateur astronomers"

    I guess I'm confused.

    When we have a lightning storm in San Diego (very rare occurrence but one is going on now) I hear/see bursts in the water hole, on HF, UHF and everywhere else I care to tune. Lightning discharges seem to be very broad band. I of course have no way to detect X rays.
    www.SETI.Net
    Jim_at_SETI.Net
    W6KYP
    Argus station DM12jw
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: MarcusJohn_at_AOL.COM
      To: public_at_setileague.org ; argus_at_setileague.org
      Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 3:14 PM
      Subject: SETI public: Lightening emissions: Xrays.

      I have here a citation from Geophysical Review Letters, 16 Jan 2005. It is at the bottom.

      One of my pet theories is that lightening on foreign worlds ought to be detectable.

      Now we have evidence that lightening emits xrays.

      I think it is possible that lightening emits in the water hole as well, since it seems
      to emit in a lot of different frequencies.

      If anyone would like to test my theory, then if they have a lightening storm within
      the line of sight, see if they can turn their Argus station towards the storm and
      see what the electronic signature of the storm is in the water hole.

      The storm has to be in the line of sight because these frequencies are not observable
      over the horizon.

      Please be careful. Turn the gain down at first, or take the LNA out of the circuit,
      and turn everything off if the storm
      is within 20 miles, so you don't get hit by the bolts.

      This obviously puts large constraints on the local topography of the Argus station.
      You cannot do this if you are deep in a valley because you cannot see 20 miles
      to the horizon. Only Argus stations on a hill will be able to do this.

      Any comments? This might be an interesting project, and it may be publishable if we
      get good data.

      John.

      X-RAY THUNDERBOLT. Scientists have long suspected that lightning
      might generate x rays. However, until recently the observation of
      such x-rays has remained elusive, largely owing to the unpredictable
      nature of lightning. In the last few years a series of experiments
      by Joseph Dwyer and his colleagues at the Florida Institute of
      Technology and the University of Florida has shown that lightning
      indeed emits large bursts of x rays with energies up to about 250
      keV (about twice that of a chest x ray). These x rays are mostly
      produced not by the bright return strokes, but by the leaders that
      precede the stroke, as they propagate from the cloud to the ground.
      Now, Dwyer and his colleagues have discovered that these bursts of x
      rays are produced at the precise moment that the lightning steps
      forward along its jagged path. For unknown reasons, lightning does
      not travel to the ground in a continuous manner, but instead
      traverses the distance in a series of discrete steps. It is this
      stepping process that gives lightning its jagged, sometimes forked,
      appearance, and Dwyer has now shown that this same stepping process
      also makes x rays. The x rays are likely produced by strong
      electric fields that accelerate electrons to close to the speed
      of light. These so-called runaway electrons collide with air
      producing bremsstrahlung ("braking radiation" in German) x-rays.
      Dwyer says that higher energy gamma rays are also emitted sometimes,
      but that these seem to come from the thunderstorm cloud itself and
      not from the lightning stroke. (Dwyer et al., Geophysical Review
      Letters, 16 January 2005.)


  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Timothy Ferris on the contributions of multiple amateur astronomers"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Mar 05 2005 - 18:53:08 PST