SETI public: NASA's Innovative Interstellar Explorer (IIE)

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Wed Jul 06 2005 - 08:49:00 PDT

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Do Telescopes Need Astronomers?"
  • Next message: Stephen A. Zarkos: "SETI Public: test"

    http://space.com/businesstechnology/050706_star_voyage.html

    Voyage to the Stars: NASA Study Mulls Options

    By Leonard David

    posted: 06 July 2005
    06:41 am ET

    To send a spacecraft where none has gone before is a dream assignment for
    any space scientist and engineer.

    The idea of dispatching a dedicated robotic probe on an interstellar trek
    has been seriously advocated for nearly 30 years. A recently finished
    appraisal of how to build such a craft shows that it is within reach -- but
    nonetheless remains a challenging task.

    A NASA-sponsored study team has blueprinted an Innovative Interstellar
    Explorer (IIE).

    Goal of the IIE would be to plunge outward some 200 Astronomical Units. An
    astronomical unit (AU) is the mean distance between the center of the Earth
    and the center of the Sun - approximately 93 million miles (150 million
    kilometers).

    Put that in your cosmic calculator and you'll get: 18,591,186,595 miles
    (29,919,614,600 kilometers).

    No matter how you figure it, that's a lot of infrequent flyer miles to
    travel.

    Pull out all the stops

    "I think we're converging on something that's doable," said Ralph McNutt,
    the principal investigator for the Innovative Interstellar Explorer study.
    He is a space scientist at The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics
    Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Maryland, and also the project scientist for
    APL's Messenger mission to Mercury.

    If launched in 2014, the probe would arrive at the 200 AU distance in about
    2044.

    Clearly, along with doses of technology and a requisite high velocity, IIE
    demands a good deal of patience from awaiting scientists here on Earth.

    McNutt said the IIE concept has moved forward over the last several years as
    a NASA Vision Mission project, through a Team X study group at Jet
    Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), and by way of NASA Institute for Advanced
    Concepts study grants.

    "There is always interest in keeping an interstellar probe going through
    various studies. But the problem that we've always run up against is
    propulsion. That's because you're trying to pull out all the stops and get
    out of the Solar System as fast as you can," McNutt told SPACE.com.

    Continuous acceleration

    In sketching out IIE, McNutt said the relatively small spacecraft would use
    radioisotope power sources that energize small electric thrusters. "You need
    to make a spacecraft that is Ômassless' as possible," he said, something
    akin to "unobtanium".

    Still, in taking a hard look at conjuring up an interstellar probe -- and
    the kind of science that could be done by the craft -- things do look
    promising.

    "We can start building them tomorrow, if we had the money," McNutt said.
    Efficient, lightweight electric propulsion and power systems are part of the
    key.

    The Innovative Interstellar Explorer would carry a compact science payload
    weighing all of 66 pounds (30 kilograms). It would be boosted from Earth
    atop a Delta 4 heavy launcher. A custom upper stage is also required.

    That initial launch energy in 2014 would push IIE to an arrival at Jupiter
    two years later where the probe would acquire a gravity assist from the
    massive planet. Long-term, low-thrust, continuous acceleration of the probe
    would be provided by a kilowatt-class ion thruster running off electricity
    provided by advanced Stirling radioisotope generators.

    Burnout speed

    The interstellar probe would cruise out of the solar system at about 7.8 AU
    per year. It would accelerate to a "burnout" speed of 9.5 AU per year at 103
    AU in November 2029.

    In contrast, Voyager 1 is speeding about 3.6 AU per year. Its twin, Voyager
    2, is a slow poke at about 3.3 AU per year.

    "The IIE would end up being at 200 AU in about 2044," McNutt noted. "Yes, I
    know that sounds like a long time from now. But you have to keep this into
    perspective. When we started out with the Voyagers, none would have believed
    they'd still be going," he said.

    In fact, the dual Voyager spacecraft launched in 1977 are now dubbed the
    Voyager Interstellar Mission (VIM), investigating the outermost edge of the
    Sun's domain ... and beyond. The Voyager probes are expected to go dead
    around 2025 as their plutonium-fueled generators are fully discharged.

    Decades of lifetime

    The 30-year mission by IIE to address fundamental scientific questions about
    the interaction of the Sun with the interstellar medium, McNutt said, can
    only be answered via on-the-spot measurements that such a mission would
    provide.

    "The idea here is to try to get as close to true interstellar space as
    possible ... past the heliopause and past what we think is an external bow
    shock," McNutt pointed out.

    But traveling for three decades to do so is tough going.

    "Designing something that's going to be good for 30 years ... that scares
    the daylights out of people," McNutt admitted. "How to qualify all the parts
    for decades of lifetime is a hard problem. But it's something that we're
    going to eventually come to terms with. We'll figure out how to deal with
    it."

    Receiver farms

    Pumping back science data from afar is also a challenge. And Earth will also
    have to keep up its end of the bargain.

    Already in the works is a hoped for upgrade of NASA's Deep Space Network,
    turning huge antenna dish complexes into "receiver farms" -- that is,
    multiple numbers of smaller antennas. That could enable reception of
    downlink signal from IIE of about five kilobytes per second out at 200 AU,
    McNutt said.

    At some point, as IIE keeps moving onward and outward, it will increasingly
    become more difficult for ground controllers on Earth to reprogram the
    spacecraft's onboard data processing unit. "The probe will then have to
    decide for itself when to phone home. It's not going to be you asking for
    the call," McNutt said.

    Pulling the plug on the Voyagers

    The recent chorus of disapproval about turning off the long-distance Voyager
    craft may be a good sign of support for interstellar probe development. The
    very idea of shutting down the venerable Voyager probes to save a few
    million dollars per year sparked public and Congressional comment.

    "I can't answer why there was an outcry," McNutt said, "but I'm certainly
    glad there was one."

    Indeed, Voyager 1 relayed in May evidence that it reached the heliosheath -
    an area just where the solar wind crashes into the thin interstellar gas of
    the galaxy.

    In a House of Representatives hearing last month, Congressman Vernon Ehlers
    of Michigan implored NASA chief, Michael Griffin, to keep a scientific ear
    attuned to Voyager. "It seems foolish to wait all these years to reach the
    heliosheath and then suddenly pull the plug," Ehlers told Griffin.

    "I assure you that I also think it's rather dumb to be turning off Voyagers
    1 and 2," Griffin responded. Nonetheless, a NASA assessment on what
    spacecraft will be kept in operation and which ones will not is to be
    wrapped up later this year, he added.

    Step to the stars

    While the Innovative Interstellar Explorer is a real study, not real
    hardware, McNutt said the reviews are favorable for such a probe to be
    lofted within a reasonable period of time.

    "This would be a stepping stone. A lot of people resonate with the science
    fiction side about taking the first step to the stars," McNutt said.

    Given a go-ahead, McNutt senses that the Innovative Interstellar Explorer
    could be done for less than $2 billion. While some might consider that
    inexpensive, there would also likely be a debate about whether the first
    dedicated step to the stars is worth it, he said.

    "Basically, it's kind of like throwing a note out in a bottle ... throwing
    it out to sea and seeing what comes back," McNutt said. "If we really want
    to understand the world around us, we ought to be out there making those
    measurements."

    Interstellar Travelers Will Have to Watch Their Language
    Sailing to the Stars: Sex and Society Aboard the First Starships
    The Closest Star System: Alpha Centauri
    NASA's Vision: Probes At Stars by 2100


  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Do Telescopes Need Astronomers?"
  • Next message: Stephen A. Zarkos: "SETI Public: test"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Jul 06 2005 - 09:10:34 PDT