Re: SETI public: Are we alone?: College offers course that seeks universal truth

From: Dr. H. Paul Shuch (n6tx_at_setileague.org)
Date: Sat Jan 08 2005 - 17:07:04 PST

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Fw: spacetoday.net article: Hubble spots potential exoplanet"

    Here's further information on the origin of the Fermi Paradox, from Eric
    Jones at Los Alamos:

    --
    Newman, Sagan, and Shklovski [2,5] recall that a legend of science says 
    that Enrico Fermi asked the question, "Where are they?" during a visit 
    to Los Alamos during the Second World War or shortly thereafter. Fermi's 
    question has been mentioned in several other recent publications, but 
    historical basis for the attribution has not been established. Thanks to 
    the excellent memory of Hans Mark, who had heard a retelling at Los 
    Alamos in the early 1950s, we now know that Fermi did make the remark 
    during a lunchtime conversation about 1950. His companions were Emil 
    Konopinski, Edward Teller, and Herbert York. All three have provided 
    accounts of the incident.
    We begin with Konopinski: "1 have only fragmentary recollections about 
    the occasion.... I do have a fairly clear memory of how the discussion 
    of extra-terrestrials got started while Enrico, Edward, Herb York, and I 
    were walking to lunch at Fuller Lodge.
    "When l joined the party, I found being discussed evidence about flying 
    saucers. That immediately brought to my mind a cartoon I had recently 
    seen in the New Yorker, explaining why public trash cans were 
    disappearing from the streets of New York City. The New York papers were 
    making a fuss about that. The cartoon showed what was evidently a flying 
    saucer sitting in the background and, streaming toward it, 'little green 
    men' (endowed with antennas) carrying the trash cans. More amusing was 
    Fermi's comment, that it was a very reasonable theory since it accounted 
    for two separate phenomena: the reports of flying saucers as well as the 
    disappearance of the trash cans. There ensued a discussion as to whether 
    the saucers could somehow exceed the speed of light."
    Teller remembers: "My recollection of the event involving Fermi . . . is 
    clear, but only partial. To begin with, I was there at the incident. I 
    believe it occurred shortly after the end of the war on a visit of Fermi 
    to the Laboratory, which quite possibly might have been during a summer.
    "I remember having walked over with Fermi and others to the Fuller Lodge 
    for lunch. While we walked over, there was a conversation which I 
    believe to have been quite brief and superficial on a subject only 
    vaguely connected with space travel. I have a vague recollection, which 
    may not be accurate, that we talked about flying saucers and the obvious 
    statement that the flying saucers are not real. I also remember that 
    Fermi explicitly raised the question, and I think he directed it at me, 
    'Edward, what do you think? How probable is it that within the next ten 
    years we shall have clear evidence of a material object moving faster 
    than light?' I remember that my answer vas ' 1 o-6.. Fermi said, 'This 
    is much too low. The probability is more like ten percent' (the well 
    known figure for a Fermi miracle.) "
    Konopinski says that he does not recall the numerical values, "except 
    that they changed rapidly as Edward and Fermi bounced arguments off each 
    other."
    Teller continues: "The conversation, according to my memory, was only 
    vaguely connected with astronautics partly on account of flying saucers 
    might be due to extraterrestrial people (here I believe the remarks were 
    purely negative), partly because exceeding light velocity would make 
    interstellar travel one degree more real.
    "We then talked about other things which I do not remember and maybe 
    approximately eight of us sat down together for lunch." Konopinski and 
    York are quite certain that there were only four of them.
    It was after we were at the luncheon table," Konopinski recalls, "that 
    Fermi surprised us with the question 'but where is everybody?' It was 
    his way of putting it that drew laughs from us ."
    York, who does not recall the preliminary conversation on the walk to 
    Fuller Lodge, does remember that "virtually apropos of nothing Fermi 
    said, 'Don't you ever wonder where everybody is?' Somehow . . . we all 
    knew he meant extra-terrestrials."
    Teller remembers the question in much the same way. "The discussion had 
    nothing to do with astronomy or with extraterrestrial beings. I think it 
    was some down-to-earth topic. Then, in the middle of this conversation, 
    Fermi came out with the quite unexpected question 'Where is everybody?' 
    . . . The result of his question was general laughter because of the 
    strange fact that in spite of Fermi's question coming from the clear 
    blue, everybody around the table seemed to understand at once that he 
    was talking about extraterrestrial life.
    "I do not believe that much came of this conversation, except perhaps a 
    statement that the distances to the next location of living beings may 
    be very great and that, indeed, as far as our galaxy is concerned, we 
    are living somewhere in the sticks, far removed from the metropolitan 
    area of the galactic center."
    York believes that Fermi was somewhat more expansive and "followed up 
    with a series of calculations on the probability of earthlike planets, 
    the probability of life given an earth, the probability of humans given 
    life, the likely rise and duration of high technology, and so on. He 
    concluded on the basis of such calculations that we ought to have been 
    visited long ago and many times over. As I recall, he went on to 
    conclude that the reason we hadn't been visited might be that 
    interstellar flight is impossible, or, if it is possible, always judged 
    to be not worth the effort, or technological civilization doesn't last 
    long enough for it to happen." York confessed to being hazy about these 
    last remarks.
    In summary, Fermi did ask the question, and perhaps not surprisingly, 
    issues still debated today were part of the discussion . Certainly, the 
    line of argument that York remembers became familiar a decade later as 
    the Drake-Greenbank Equation [6,7].
    A final point: the date of the conversation. York is clearest on the 
    date. "The conversation was either in the summer of 1950, 1951, or 1952, 
    very probably 1951, and took place . . . when I was visiting LASL in 
    connection with the forthcoming Greenhouse tests - specifically, the 
    George shot." The George test occurred on May 8, 1951, suggesting a 1950 
    date. Surviving correspondence from the time indicates that Fermi was an 
    annual summer visitor during the years in question. Unfortunately, 
    attendance and travel records for those years have been destroyed. 
    However, we have the evidence of the cartoon Konopinski mentions. Drawn 
    by Alan Dunn, it was published in the May 20, 1950, issue of The New 
    Yorker. It seems quite probable that the incident of Fermi's question 
    occurred in the summer of 1950.
    I am grateful to Hans Mark and to the three surviving participants for 
    their accounts.
    --
    As it happens, I will be seeing Hans Mark in March, and will ask him for 
    further clarification, and his own recollections.
    	All best,
    	Paul
    -- 
    H. Paul Shuch, Ph.D.    Executive Director, The SETI League, Inc.
    433 Liberty Street, PO Box 555, Little Ferry NJ 07643 USA
    voice (201) 641-1770;  fax (201) 641-1771; URL http://www.setileague.org
    email work: n6tx_at_setileague.org;  home: drseti_at_cal.berkeley.edu
    "We Know We're Not Alone!"
    

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Fw: spacetoday.net article: Hubble spots potential exoplanet"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Jan 08 2005 - 17:13:52 PST