SETI public: How unlikely is a doomsday catastrophe?

• Previous message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Colloquium on the Law of Transhuman Persons Marks International Human Rights Day"

Paper: astro-ph/0512204

Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 05:17:15 GMT (21kb)

Title: How unlikely is a doomsday catastrophe?

Authors: Max Tegmark (MIT), Nick Bostrom (Oxford)

Comments: 3 pages, 1 fig
\\
Numerous Earth-destroying doomsday scenarios have recently been analyzed,
including breakdown of a metastable vacuum state and planetary destruction
triggered by a "strangelet" or microscopic black hole. We point out that
many
previous bounds on their frequency give a false sense of security: one
cannot
infer that such events are rare from the the fact that Earth has survived
for
so long, because observers are by definition in places lucky enough to have
avoided destruction. We derive a new upper bound of one per 10^9 years
(99.9%
c.l.) on the exogenous terminal catastrophe rate that is free of such
selection
bias, using the relatively late formation time of Earth.

\\ ( http://arXiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0512204 , 21kb)

• Previous message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Colloquium on the Law of Transhuman Persons Marks International Human Rights Day"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Dec 09 2005 - 10:31:34 PST