Re: SETI public: artificial signal definition

From: Pete Heist (peteheist_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Sep 28 2004 - 20:18:14 PDT

  • Next message: william edmondson: "Re: SETI public: artificial signal definition"

    William Edmondson wrote:

    > (http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~whe/SETIPaper.pdf)

    That was an interesting paper William. Thanks for
    sharing, and may your dish time leave you intrigued.

    I have a couple of questions that are more about the
    detection of pulsed signals in general than
    specifically about the method described, so they're
    open to anyone (omnidirectional, "weak intent"
    questions, to make a strained parallel).

    First I'd like to restate the proposal to verify that
    I get the gist. Pulsars may be used to determine the
    period and direction of possible pulsed signals as
    follows:

    P ----- E ----- ETI

    P = Pulsar with period A
    E = Earth
    ETI = Transmitting ETI

    We at Earth point our dishes opposite P and look for
    signals pulsed with period A (perhaps on the hydrogen
    line, why not). Did I get it?

    My questions are:

    - How much does knowing the period of a pulsed signal
    practically help us to detect it? Verification I
    understand.

    - Even if we know the period, we don't know the phase.
    What kind of challenge does that present in detection,
    if any?

    cheers,
    Pete

                    
    _______________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
    http://vote.yahoo.com


  • Next message: william edmondson: "Re: SETI public: artificial signal definition"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Sep 28 2004 - 21:00:53 PDT