SETI public: FW: Jonathan's Space Report, No. 520

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Thu Feb 12 2004 - 08:47:03 PST

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Darwin's Universe"



    >From: owner-jsr@host.planet4589.org
    >Subject: Jonathan's Space Report, No. 520
    >Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:22:18 -0500
    >
    >Jonathan's Space Report
    >No. 520                                      2004 Feb 11, Somerville, MA
    >-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    >The Progress No. 248 (M-48) cargo ship was undocked from Zvezda at
    >0835:56 on Jan 28 and deorbited at 1311 UTC over the Pacific, completing
    >the ISS 12P mission. The new cargo ship, Progress No. 260 (Progress
    >M1-11) was launched from Baykonur on Jan 29 at 1158:08 on ISS mission
    >13P and docked with the Zvezda module on the Space Station at 1313:11
    >UTC on Jan 31. The new Progress carries cargo including experiments for
    >the ESA/Netherlands DELTA mission and two new Orlan spacesuits, serials
    >M-25 and M-26. It also carries a replacement flexhose for the Destiny
    >lab window (culprit in last month's air leak) and equipment to be
    >installed on Zvezda to support docking by the new European ATV cargo
    >ship Jules Verne.
    >
    >Opportunity began roving on Mars at 0950 UTC on Jan 31. (Parachute and
    >heat shield separation time for Opportunity was of course 0452-0453 UTC
    >on Jan 25, not 0504 UTC as I said in JSR 519.)
    >Opportunity has now peeped over the crater rim and seen its parachute
    >and backshell lying on the Meridiani plains beyond. Spirit's file system
    >was reformatted on Feb 4 and it has now resumed its exploration of the
    >Gusev region.
    >
    >Location of the MER landings:
    >                     (Areocentric)        (IAU Areographic)
    >     Spirit          14.57S     175.47E   14.93S  184.53W
    >     Opportunity      1.95S     354.47E    1.98S    5.53W
    >
    >(While one JPL release gave the Spirit location to 0.0001 deg, their
    >  superimposed image is significantly off the later known location
    >  of the lander. Anyone who has more accurate coords, please forward them
    >  - I'd like to catalog the separate positions of the heat shields and
    >    backshells, which are about 0.01 deg away from the landers).
    >
    >SES Americom's AMC-10 satellite was launched on Feb 5 by a Lockheed
    >Martin/ILS Atlas IIAS from Cape Canaveral. The satellite is a Lockheed
    >Martin A2100 with a launch mass of 2315 kg and 907 kg dry (Thanks to David
    >Legangneux for the mass data). After launch at 2346 UTC, Centaur AC-165
    >reached a 185 x 185 km orbit at 2355 UTC. The second Centaur burn at
    >0009 UTC on Feb 6 put the satellite in geostationary transfer orbit.
    >AMC-10 will replace Satcom C-4. The AMC (Americom) series of satellites
    >descends from the original RCA Americom system first launched in 1975
    >as one of the earliest private telecom satellite networks.
    >
    >Cutting Space Science?
    >----------------------------------
    >
    >Although the President's 2005 budget request to Congress includes an
    >overall small increase for NASA to pay for new human space exploration,
    >some aspects of space science and astronomy are under the axe. The
    >detailed status of the NASA space science budget remains unclear, but
    >the overall picture is not encouraging, with immediate cuts to some
    >programs and a forecast of a long term continuing (inflation-adjusted)
    >decrease for overall science to pay for the new human exploration
    >intiative.
    >
    >The total extrasolar astronomy budget (Origins and SEU themes) has
    >remained stable this year, but there have been major reallocations with
    >no consultation with the science peer-review community. Although some
    >programs such as the JWST infrared telescope and the search for
    >extrasolar planets have managed to argue that they are part of
    >`exploration' and for now survive unscathed or even boosted (until the
    >real costs of the CEV program require further cuts)  some of the most
    >scientifically successful parts of NASA, including the Explorer program
    >and the Structure/Evolution of the Universe theme (SEU) appear to be
    >facing a bleak long-term future.
    >
    >Cuts are being made to the Explorer program previously extolled as a
    >flagship example of a federal program (recent Explorer missions included
    >WMAP, which determined the age of the Universe).  MIDEX and SMEX
    >missions are to be delayed and cut back. (One colleague commented that
    >the idea that the Explorers don't do exploration was 'positively
    >Orwellian'). Money is also being taken from the budget of the
    >Constellation X mission, highly rated by the National Academy of
    >Sciences; the mission will be postponed for an unknown amount of time.
    >The Beyond Einstein probes, previously expected to start getting funding
    >this year, are to be indefinitely delayed.
    >
    >Editorial (last one for a while I hope)
    >---------
    >
    >While the Station program was over budget and slipping, and the Mars
    >probes were failing, missions like the Explorers and Chandra were a
    >bright spot for NASA. Now our hard work and success are to be rewarded
    >with significant cutbacks. Let me say it clearly: I support the idea of
    >an enhanced human exploration program, but I strongly oppose paying for
    >it at the cost of losing the successors to Chandra and WMAP, and the
    >chance of a partial replacement for  Hubble (which JWST is not). I
    >believe there is strong public support for basic research, there are
    >clear technological and educational benefits to understanding the
    >extreme physics these missions study, and the US national interest would
    >be best served by protecting the relatively small amount of money in the
    >successful and productive program to study the deep universe,  even at
    >the cost of slight stretchout of the ambitious exploration program. At
    >the very least, the space community should be aware that these decisions
    >are being made rather than passing over them in silence - it's such a
    >small part of the budget that analyses in magazines like AvWeek didn't
    >mention it.
    >
    >Table of Recent Launches
    >-----------------------
    >
    >Date UT       Name            Launch Vehicle  Site            Mission    INTL.
    >                                                                           DES.
    >Jan 11 0413   Estrela do Sul    Zenit-3SL       Odyssey           Comms      01A
    >Jan 29 1158   Progress M1-11    Soyuz-U         Baykonur          Cargo      02A
    >Feb  5 2346   AMC-10            Atlas IIAS      Canaveral SLC36A  Comms      03A
    >
    >.-------------------------------------------------------------------------.
    >|  Jonathan McDowell                 |  phone : (617) 495-7176            |
    >|  Somerville MA 02143               |  inter : jcm@host.planet4589.org   |
    >|  USA                               |          jcm@cfa.harvard.edu       |
    >|                                                                         |
    >| JSR: http://www.planet4589.org/jsr.html                                 |
    >| Back issues:  http://www.planet4589.org/space/jsr/back                  |
    >| Subscribe/unsub: mail majordomo@host.planet4589.org, (un)subscribe jsr  |
    >'-------------------------------------------------------------------------'
    >
    >


    Plan your next US getaway to one of the super destinations here.
  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Darwin's Universe"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Feb 12 2004 - 09:07:53 PST