SETI public: Fw: Physics News Update 658

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Wed Oct 22 2003 - 07:34:17 PDT

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Fw: AstroAlert: News from VSNET"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: physnews_at_aip.org
    Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 10:09 AM
    To: ljk4_at_MSN.COM
    Subject: Physics News Update 658

    PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE
    The American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News
    Number 658 October 21, 2003 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and
    James Riordon

    DIRECT IMAGING OF EXTRASOLAR PLANETS might be easier than
    astronomers thought, a new study shows. Evidence for the existence
    of planets around nearby stars comes mostly in the form of tiny
    Doppler shifts in the star's spectra as one or more orbiting planets
    tug on the star. In a few cases the transit of a planet across the
    face of a star can be detected from a minute dimming of the star's
    emission. These approaches are indirect. The problem of imaging
    extrasolar planets directly is that the planet is far outshone by
    the nearby star. One proposed way of getting around this glare
    problem is to use nulling interferometry. In ordinary interferometry
    the light waves from two or more telescopes are added together in
    such a way that the resulting observation is equivalent to one made
    with a single telescope with a much wider diameter than any of the
    component scopes. But instead of maximizing the composite signal
    from the distant object, it can be minimized (see past Update item
    at http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/1998/split/pnu397-3.htm ). By
    doing this, a weaker nearby object, like a planet, might suddenly
    emerge from what had been irrepressible glare.
    In a new paper, William Danchi (Goddard Space Flight Center) and his
    colleagues have performed extensive studies of the interferometry
    nulling technique, especially the way in which increasing the
    precision of component detectors increases the degree to which the
    star's image is truly nulled, the better to see either smaller
    planets or planets that are closer in toward their parent star.
    Both the smaller and closer criteria are pertinent when searching
    for earth-like extrasolar planets. Danchi (wcd_at_iri1.gsfc.nasa.gov,
    301-286-4586) says that the new study shows that with the right
    configuration of detectors, the spatial resolution of the overall
    interferometer (which is related to its size) can be less than have
    been thought, an important consideration for what would be an
    orbiting space-based observatory. Danchi envisions that a
    first-round nulling interferometer using two half-meter-sized
    telescopes separated by a 12-meter boom could observe already
    discovered extrasolar planets (including spectroscopic studies of
    atmospheres). With a later, larger version of the nulling
    interferometer one could hope to search for earthlike planets
    harboring characteristic molecules such as ozone, and/or oxygen,
    plus carbon dioxide, water, and methane. Detecting these molecules
    could help determine the age of the planet and what life processes
    might be occurring there. (Danchi, Deming, Kuchner, and Seager,
    Astrophysical Journal Letters, 1 November 2003; preprint
    astro-ph/0309361)

    EVIDENCE FOR AN UNUSUALLY ACTIVE SUN since the 1940s comes from a
    new estimation of sunspots back to the ninth century. Many natural
    phenomena such as solar radiance and sunspots vary according to
    natural cycles. The variation is subject also to additional
    fluctuations (arising from as yet unexplained effects) which
    complicate any study which examines only a short time interval.
    The longer the baseline, the more confident one can be in drawing
    out historical conclusions. In the case of sunspots, the direct
    counting goes back to Galileo's time, around 1610. But earlier
    sunspot activity can be deduced from beryllium-10 traces in
    Greenland and Antarctic ice cores. The reasoning is as follows: more
    sunspots imply a more magnetically active sun which then more
    effectively repels the galactic cosmic rays, thus reducing their
    production of Be-10 atoms in the Earth's atmosphere. Be-10 atoms
    precipitate on Earth and can be traced in polar ice even after
    centuries. Using this approach, scientists at the University of Oulu
    in Finland (Ilya Usoskin, ilya.usoskin_at_oulu.fi, 358-8-553-1377) and
    the Max Planck Institute in Katlenburg-Lindau in Germany have
    reconstructed the sunspot count back to the year 850, nearly
    tripling the baseline for sunspot studies. They conclude that over
    the whole 1150 year record available, the sun has been most
    magnetically active (greatest number of sunspots) over the recent 60
    years. (Usoskin et al., Physical Review Letters, upcoming article)

    CAN A SINGLE GAS BUBBLE SINK A SHIP? Yes, according to an
    experimental and theoretical analysis performed by researchers at
    Monash University in Australia (David May and Joseph Monaghan,
    Joe.Monaghan_at_sci.monash.edu.au). The ocean floor contains vast
    quantities of methane gas hydrates, ice-like crystals of methane
    surrounded by cages of water molecules. If disturbed, these methane
    gas hydrates can erupt from the floor and rise to the surface as gas
    bubbles, some of which can be very large. Copious amounts of methane
    hydrates exist in the North Sea, which lies in between the United
    Kingdom and continental Europe. At a large eruption site in the
    North Sea known as the Witches Hole off the coast of Aberdeen, a
    sonar survey recently uncovered the presence of a sunken vessel, but
    the cause of the wreck remains undetermined. Simple experiments
    have previously shown that many small bubbles rising to the surface
    could sink a cylinder of water (and conceivably a ship), by causing
    a loss of buoyancy (Denardo et al., American Journal of Physics,
    October 2001). But could a single large gas bubble do the trick?
    The Monash researchers investigated this possibility in a simple,
    roughly two-dimensional system. Trapping water between a pair of
    vertical glass plates, and launching single gas bubbles from the
    bottom, they used a video camera to observe a single large bubble's
    effect on a small piece of acrylic shaped like the hull of a boat.
    Along with numerical simulations of this scenario, the experiments
    showed that the bubble could sink the ship, if the bubble's radius
    was comparable to or greater than the ship's hull. Sinking would
    occur because a mound of water formed above the bubble as it
    approached the surface. As the bubble reached the surface, it would
    temporarily lift the ship. However, water in the mound would then
    flow off the sides of the bubble, forming deep troughs at either
    side, and the water flow would carry the boat to one of the
    troughs. In addition, the eventual rupture of the bubble would
    create high-velocity jets of fluid that moved into the troughs,
    creating vortices that further pulled down the boat. The
    researchers say that their numerical simulations could test other
    scenarios, including those involving multiple large bubbles, more
    realistic boats, and ultimately a full three-dimensional simulation.
    (American Journal of Physics, September 2003).

    ***********
    PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE is a digest of physics news items arising
    from physics meetings, physics journals, newspapers and
    magazines, and other news sources. It is provided free of charge
    as a way of broadly disseminating information about physics and
    physicists. For that reason, you are free to post it, if you like,
    where others can read it, providing only that you credit AIP.
    Physics News Update appears approximately once a week.

    AUTO-SUBSCRIPTION OR DELETION: By using the expression
    "subscribe physnews" in your e-mail message, you
    will have automatically added the address from which your
    message was sent to the distribution list for Physics News Update.
    If you use the "signoff physnews" expression in your e-mail message,
    the address in your message header will be deleted from the
    distribution list. Please send your message to:
    listserv_at_listserv.aip.org
    (Leave the "Subject:" line blank.)


  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Fw: AstroAlert: News from VSNET"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Oct 24 2003 - 17:31:34 PDT