SETI public: Beam Us Up, General Clark

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Sun Oct 05 2003 - 11:05:19 PDT

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Space Environment Center (SEC) Funding in Jeopardy"

    At least Clark has some concept of science.

    Beam Us Up, General Clark

    October 5, 2003
    By DENNIS OVERBYE

    Weird things certainly happen during election season, but
    it's doubtful that even the most hardened seen-it-all
    pundit would have dreamed that Einstein's theory of
    relativity would turn up as an issue in an American
    presidential campaign.

    Yet last week a leading Democratic candidate, Gen. Wesley
    Clark, expressed the hope that spaceships might one day be
    engineered to go faster than the speed of light, a staple
    of science fiction.

    In a discussion of NASA's future at a recent gathering in
    New Hampshire, General Clark ventured a look into the far,
    far future. "I still believe in E=mc2," he said, according
    to Wired.com, "but I can't believe that in all of human
    history, we'll never, ever be able to go beyond the speed
    of light."

    Saying he had argued with some physicists and friends about
    the idea, the general described it as "my only faith-based
    initiative."

    Soon afterward, The New York Post pictured the general in a
    "Star Trek" uniform, pointing out that such a proposition
    would violate the laws of physics.

    If we could go faster than light, Einstein once said, we
    could send a telegram into the past, and everyone knows
    time travel is impossible.

    Or do they?

    In recent years, time travel has become a serious topic in
    theoretical physics, debated at conferences and explicated
    in popular books like "Black Holes and Timewarps," by the
    Caltech theorist Kip S. Thorne, and "Time Travel in
    Einstein's Universe," by the Princeton astrophysicist J.
    Richard Gott. Last year, the topic came up at a
    60th-birthday symposium in honor of Stephen Hawking, the
    Cambridge cosmologist and author.

    So don't be too quick to consign the general to a Star
    Fleet command, a few physicists suggested last week.

    Einstein's special theory of relativity, which he
    propounded from a patent office in 1905, did establish the
    speed of light - about 186,000 miles per second - as the
    cosmic speed limit for matter and information.

    But the general theory of relativity, which Einstein
    published in 1916, holds out the possibility of a loophole.
    That theory describes gravity as the bending of space-time
    by matter and energy. Space-time, the theory maintains, can
    be bent into wormholes and other shapes that could provide
    shortcuts through space and time, allowing a traveler to
    beat a light beam that took a route through regular space.

    "This weirdness of space allows in principle for the
    possibility of time travel," said Lawrence M. Krauss, an
    astrophysicist at Case Western Reserve University, and the
    author of "The Physics of Star Trek."

    One of the first to realize that Einstein's universe had
    room for such strangeness was the mathematician and
    logician Kurt Gvdel, who wrote a paper about it in 1949.
    Wormhole travel was featured prominently in the movie
    <object.title class="Movie" idsrc="nyt_ttl"
    value="155654;156934">"Contact,"</object.title> starring
    Jodie Foster and based on the novel of the same name by the
    astronomer Carl Sagan.

    Nobody knows whether such things are actually possible in
    the real world. One obstacle is the "grandmother paradox,"
    which raises the theoretical possibility of going back in
    time and killing your own grandmother. And the resources
    required to build a wormhole, even if possible, would be
    gargantuan, physicists say. "It's expensive," Dr. Gott
    said, "but that is a question for politicians."

    Describing faster-than-light travel as a faith-based
    initiative was accurate, Dr. Krauss said. "At this point
    the details are not known, so in some sense it is all a
    matter of faith," he acknowledged. "But I wouldn't bet on
    it."

    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/05/weekinreview/05OVER.html?ex=1066376201&ei=1&en=22694d9640b14333


  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI public: Space Environment Center (SEC) Funding in Jeopardy"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sun Oct 05 2003 - 11:18:43 PDT