SETI public: Fw: [DarlingsSpace] David Darling's Newsletter #13

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Sun Jul 06 2003 - 17:10:57 PDT

  • Next message: Larry Kayser: "Re: SETI public: Pattern Recognition....."

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: daviddarling123
    Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 8:26 AM
    To: DarlingsSpace_at_yahoogroups.com
    Subject: [DarlingsSpace] David Darling's Newsletter #13

    ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
    Inkjet cartridges up to 80% off. HP, Epson, Lexmark--we have your brand.
    Free shipping on every order to the U.S. and Canada! Excellent service.
    http://www.c1tracking.com/l.asp?cid=5510
    http://us.click.yahoo.com/QWB0QC/.eUGAA/ySSFAA/1.XolB/TM
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------~->

    DAVID DARLING'S NEWSLETTER
    ----------------------------------------

    Issue #13
    July 5, 2003
    e-mail: darling_at_uslink.net
    website: www.daviddarling.info
    ----------------------------------------

    1. Meanderings
    2. Hive Minds and the Borg
    3. Bookends
    ----------------------------------------

    1. Meanderings

    Well, here I am, sitting in the shade of a tree (I wanted to
    say "old oak", but the nearest one of those is about ten yards
    away), under a cloudless sky, with a pleasant breeze blowing off the
    lake and a cold drink by my side. The old enemy is firing up the
    barbecue for a Fourth-on-the-Fifth-of-July celebratory feast to
    which I (a Brit in Minnesota) have been invited on condition that I
    don't try to reclaim the colony for Queen and Country, and all is
    well with the world (at least, my little corner of it). But I
    wonder.... Out there, in the cold darkness of space, where no one
    can hear you scream, what lies in wait for us?
    ------------------------------------------

    2. Hive Minds and the Borg

    I take it you're familiar with the various incarnations of Star
    Trek, even if you aren't actually a card-carrying Trekker. But, in
    case you missed out on the show's greatest evil entity, let me
    introduce you to -- the Borg. For the complete neophyte, here are
    some official facts on the species from Paramount:

    http://www.startrek.com/library/xeno.asp?ID=70558

    Now, I've had a bit of a discussion with one of my buddies (yes, you
    Brian!) about whether Borg shouldn't really be plural. His
    contention is that, since there are lots of them, we really ought to
    call them "borgs." However, as we shall see, the situation is
    complicated by the nature of Borgian intelligence and society.
    That's really what I want to get on to. But mention has to be made
    first of the prime urge of the Borg (adopting the singular by Star
    Trek convention), which is to "assimilate." If you have something
    useful -- a civilization or a starship, say -- the Borg will acquire
    it and, as part of the assimilation process (to which resistance is
    futile), turn you into a new member of the Borg collective. This is
    a very unpleasant and, it seems to me, ridiculously primitive
    process. Usually it involves the amputation of part of your arm,
    including that most fantastically useful and adaptable appendage,
    the hand, and the substitution in its place of something that looks
    like it cost about $50 from Home Depot. Small circular saws or mini
    pincers seem to be de rigeur. You will also receive various extra
    plumbing, a substitute eye that emits a red laser beam, and,
    courtesy of an infusion of "nanobes," a new, sickly skin color. Thus
    kitted out, looking like a deranged Black & Decker salesman, you are
    ready to begin your new career as one of the Borg. Ah, but there's
    that problem with terminology again. You see, the central feature of
    Borg existence is the hive mind and so the phrase "one of the Borg"
    is somewhat meaningless (though "one with the Borg" would work).

    Despite looking like an individual, each Borg is intimately linked
    to the global consciousness of the collective and totally subjugated
    to its will. Could such a state of affairs -- a single advanced
    intelligence distributed among many physically distinct but mentally
    unified organisms -- actually exist somewhere in the Universe? On
    Earth, of course, we have social insects -- ants, termites, and some
    types of bee, for example. Here's a good introduction to them:

    http://www.ndsu.nodak.edu/entomology/topics/societies.htm

    Obviously, Star Trek's Borg are (is?) modeled on such creatures.
    There are drones and, one of Star Trek's most delicious creations,
    the Borg Queen, who, when questioned as to her role in the Borgian
    scheme of things, remarks enigmatically "I bring order to chaos."
    Well, you'd be hard pressed to argue that an ant colony has any
    substantial level of intelligence. Ants communicate by pheromone
    signals, it's true, and they lay down chemical trails that may be
    regarded as shared cognitive maps. But they don't think or react in
    novel ways to situations. They're hard-wired to keep on doing the
    same things, over and over and over again. Having said this, a lot
    has been written, in recent years, about what's become known as
    collective intelligence or swarm intelligence. Here's a little essay
    that talks about how much of the behavior of social insects, such as
    how termites "decide" where to build their mounds or ants "choose"
    the shortest path to a food source, comes about as a result of self-
    organizing processes:

    http://ai-depot.com/Essay/SocialInsects.html

    Could there be such a thing as true high-level hive intelligence? I
    think you could make a pretty good case that the Internet is heading
    that way. When you're surfing the Web, hopping from site to site,
    sharing e-mails, joining in live chat rooms, or engaging as some
    alternative persona in a real-time, multi-user adventure game,
    there's a genuine sense that you're part of a larger, multicomponent
    mind -- your self temporarily merged with a complex web of servers,
    software, and millions of other organic processing nodes like
    yourself. Now imagine a time -- and it may not be too long off --
    when direct brain-computer interfaces become available. Then you'll
    be able to plug yourself more or less seamlessly into the great WWW
    and become like a single cell, or drone, in the giant brain of the
    planet. With wireless technology and high-bandwidth, 24-hour-a-day
    Internet access, you'd never need be alone with your thoughts again.

    Hmm. Not sure I'd want that. What happens if, or rather when,
    hackers get into your brain, via its Internet interface, and start
    downloading your innermost secrets -- or worse, implanting new,
    unwanted memories or viruses. Can you imagine waking up and finding
    that you have a sudden urge to buy 500 useless products? Yes, spam
    has finally found its way directly into your gray matter!

    This brings us to the pros and cons of hive intelligence. In some
    classic science fiction tales, such as Olaf Stapledon's Star Maker
    and Arthur C. Clarke's Childhood End (Clarke, like Freeman Dyson,
    was strongly influenced by Stapledon), the blending of individual
    minds into a global consciousness is presented in a positive light
    and as the ultimate stage of human evolution. See my encyclopedia
    page:

    http://www.angelfire.com/on2/daviddarling/hiveintel.htm

    There are obvious advantages to being intimately part of a much
    bigger intelligence and mental support structure. But you have to
    give up some or all of your individuality in the process. And, for
    many, that may seem too high a price to pay. The Borg represent the
    worse case scenario in which your individuality is forcibly wrenched
    away and you're then compelled to carry out heinous acts, including
    further assimilations, for the good of the collective. This theme of
    being "taken over" was a common one in 'fifties sci-fi movies, such
    as Invasion of the Body Snatchers, and a thinly-veiled cosmic
    transposition of the perceived communist threat of that era. I think
    that's why the Borg are the preeminent foe in the Star Trek
    universe. Yes, they look ugly and play dirty. But what really makes
    them scary is that they are the ultimate communist hardliners, bent
    on quashing individuality and personal ambition, while the
    Federation (an idealized extension of the United States) is all for
    liberty and human rights. It's a nice irony then that the
    Federation, in the long run, tends to do most of the assimilating --
    even implanting a desire in the Borg break away from its
    totalitarian regime.

    Are there any hive minds out there? As the development of the
    Internet and the promise of neural links suggests, they may be a
    routine outcome of advanced information technology throughout the
    Galaxy and beyond. We might be at this stage ourselves, if we allow
    it to happen, within the next century or so. But what about a
    naturally-evolved hive mind in which the superorganism has
    intellectual powers that match or surpass those of a single human?
    This seems to me much more unlikely because of the extreme
    communication demands of this type of processing. Ants can get by
    with chemical signals. But a colony with a high degree of mental
    cohesion and corporate intelligence would have to flash vast amounts
    of information between its components, in the same way that neurons
    of the brain shuttle large amounts of data quickly back and forth.
    Some kind of physical connection -- a nerve or nerve analog -- would
    seem to be indispensable to support an adequate bandwidth. And then
    what you end up with is really no more than a modified single brain -
    - a colonial organism whose processing nodes are located at the ends
    of biological wires that can reach out in different directions
    though (because of the problem of signal delay) not over great
    distances. While it's possible to imagine such a creature, it's hard
    to fathom why nature would choose it as a solution, when a more
    compact brain can operate far more efficiently. But I'd love to be
    proved wrong!

    For more discussion of all the topics mentioned here, see
    http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Global/Posthumanity/WeBorg.html
    --------------------------------

    3. Bookends

    June was newsletterless because of feverish, last-minute work on the
    next Darling opus, "The Universal Book of Astronomy," which is the
    companion volume to "The Complete Book of Spaceflight" published
    last year. Amazon already has a page devoted to it and there's also
    a description in the Wiley catalog at:

    http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-0471265691.html

    For more on all my books and other stuff that interests me at the
    moment, stop in at my website

    http://www.daviddarling.info

    And feel free to write me at any time.

    Until next time,
    Best wishes,
    David Darling


  • Next message: Larry Kayser: "Re: SETI public: Pattern Recognition....."

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sun Jul 06 2003 - 17:31:29 PDT