> This is the ol' Anthropocentric Argument ... & is really
> proof of nothing, as what it is saying is this:
> "We're here, therefore the Universe must have been built
> (intelligently designed) just for us to exist."
> Um, no. That doesn't logically follow.
I wound have not worded it like that. Let me paraphrase to say what I meant.
"We're here, therefore the Universe might have been built (intelligently
designed) just for us to exist".
This is not an argument, but a statement of an opinion, and proves that I am
able to have an opinion.
Thanks, but lets let the religion thread die.