archive: Re: SETI The assumption

Re: SETI The assumption

David Woolley ( david@djwhome.demon.co.uk )
Sat, 15 May 1999 10:09:54 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Previous message: David Woolley: "Re: SETI@home - Windows + Mac Platforms"
Next message: Alfred A. Aburto Jr.: "Re: SETI re:seti@home <- Correction"

> better? After all, space exploration will require something much faster than
> the speed of light to travel and communicate.

Beware: the true logic of this would be that space exploration is, to the
best of our current knowledge impossible. A being a requirement for B doesn't
imply A is true unless B is known to be true. Currently everything points
to A being false.

Previous message: David Woolley: "Re: SETI@home - Windows + Mac Platforms"
Next message: Alfred A. Aburto Jr.: "Re: SETI re:seti@home <- Correction"