No corporate pressure there.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]On
> Behalf Of Fractenna@aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 2:47 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Active SETI in the news
> RE: ACtive SETI
> I am in no way saying the idea is fundamentally flawed: using
> soviet telescope
> for this purpose is an excellent idea. My concern is the
> modality and the
> pointing--ask yourself: are we 'being intelligent' or are we
> compromising in
> some non-optimal way which makes us basically a 'leaky' transmittor?