archiv~1: Re: SETI ATNF clams up on 1.451 ghz hit.Delete-able thread.

Re: SETI ATNF clams up on 1.451 ghz hit.Delete-able thread.

Jim Ostrowski ( jimostr@ca-ois.com )
Sun, 22 Nov 1998 08:41:57 -0800

MarcusJohn@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/21/98 1:38:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, jimostr@ca-
> ois.com writes:
>
> > The fact that you have to ask this question illustrates the problem.
> > It's obvious to me but apparently your particular orientation and
> > mindset prevents you from seeing it somehow, Dr. Cohen.
>
> Ok, now. That's enough time spent on this matter. Thank you for your interest,
> but you can analyze all you want and spend 100 posts on the matter, and it is
> still a hoax. Please see the seti leagues website for further documentation.
> Most of your questions are answered there.
>
> > The big mystery is the identity , motivation and institutional
> > affiliation (if any) of the hoaxer(s).
>
> And what are you doing to find the motivation and affiliation of the hoaxer?
>

I already get the impression that the subject of the hoax is an
unwelcome topic on this list. Do you really wish to continue it by
asking me questions relevant to this issue?

If so , don't accuse me later of posting off topic and irrelevant
material here. Although you and I both know this issue is relevant to
the general integrity of so-called SETI science, if you want to ignore
it , and aren't interested in my answers
to your questions then don't ask them.

JO