archiv~1: Re: SETI Re: ATNF clams up on 1.451 ghz hit.

Re: SETI Re: ATNF clams up on 1.451 ghz hit.

Fractenna@aol.com
Sat, 21 Nov 1998 08:48:31 EST

In a message dated 11/20/98 11:51:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, jimostr@ca-
ois.com writes:

<<
How about this:

1. His (Dr.Norris') conclusions were arbitrary, NOT reasoned.
>>

No; it was based upon experience. The signal strength and frquency at which
Norris saw the interference was incompatible with the other
--alleged--observations, which were wrong anyway because they were fabricated.

NC