archiv~1: Re: SETI Hmm...

Re: SETI Hmm...

Fractenna@aol.com
Fri, 20 Nov 1998 14:37:05 EST

In a message dated 11/20/98 1:11:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, jimostr@ca-
ois.com writes:

<< You, Dr. Shuch , and everyone else here who brushes this aside or dodges
the issue by bringing up the hoax matter, are participating in the
attempted burial of this inarguable conclusion.
>>
No; on the contrary. You are not reading. Here are some gems which clinch the
deal:

1) The first set of data were copies of one another;
2) The second set did not have 'on-offs' such as one sees with a telescope;
3) BOTH GU0NHD and JA1TR data were fabricated and attributed to individuals
who had no idea their names were being used.

One need reach no other conclusion: bogus data does not a hope make.

NC