archiv~1: Re: SETI ATNF clams up on 1.451 ghz hit.

Re: SETI ATNF clams up on 1.451 ghz hit.

KEN CHATTENTON ( (no email) )
Fri, 20 Nov 1998 16:45:37 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Ostrowski <jimostr@ca-ois.com>
To: Fractenna@aol.com <Fractenna@aol.com>
Cc: seti@sni.net <seti@sni.net>
Date: 20 November 1998 16:31
Subject: Re: SETI ATNF clams up on 1.451 ghz hit.

>Fractenna@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> In a message dated 11/19/98 8:25:49 PM Eastern Standard Time, jimostr@ca-
>> ois.com writes:
>>
>> <<
>> So it appears we have a case where a hoax is solved by yourself and some
>> associate(s) of yours as to content BEFORE it is even perpetrated in a
>> public way.
>>
>> How conveeeeenient!
>> >>
>>
>> How wrooooooong!
>>
>> NC
>
>
>Dear Professor,
>
>Look, as I said I will unsubscribe today , but I don't want to leave
>here without having my facts straight when I take this subject
>elsewhwere as you suggested.
>
>I quote _DR._ Shuch:
>
>"Actually, the analysis was done between registered Project Argus
>participants, on the *closed* signal verification email list, two days
>before the alleged signal was posted to the open list, and before the
>Geocities site even came into existence."
>
>Is this incorrect?
>
>Jim Ostrowski
>
>YES THIS IS CORRECT...........Ken UK.