archiv~1: Re: SETI ATNF clams up on 1.451 ghz hit.

Re: SETI ATNF clams up on 1.451 ghz hit.

Jim Ostrowski ( jimostr@ca-ois.com )
Fri, 20 Nov 1998 18:48:18 -0800

Fractenna@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 11/19/98 8:25:49 PM Eastern Standard Time, jimostr@ca-
> ois.com writes:
>
> <<
> So it appears we have a case where a hoax is solved by yourself and some
> associate(s) of yours as to content BEFORE it is even perpetrated in a
> public way.
>
> How conveeeeenient!
> >>
>
> How wrooooooong!
>
> NC

Dear Professor,

Look, as I said I will unsubscribe today , but I don't want to leave
here without having my facts straight when I take this subject
elsewhwere as you suggested.

I quote _DR._ Shuch:

"Actually, the analysis was done between registered Project Argus
participants, on the *closed* signal verification email list, two days
before the alleged signal was posted to the open list, and before the
Geocities site even came into existence."

Is this incorrect?

Jim Ostrowski