archiv~1: Re: SETI Off-topic Censorious Posts

Re: SETI Off-topic Censorious Posts

William E. Mrozinski ( (no email) )
Wed, 18 Nov 1998 09:14:17 -0500

Why is it that posts at the Art Bell site are readily taken by you at face value
but when someone points out a fact that many credible people are in consensus on
( ie. the gifs and other data as supplied by the hacker are crap ), you can only
believe THIS information with 'additional verifiable evidence'. Maybe you should
reverse your logic and question the 'data' received from the Art Bell
entertainment site until additional verifiable evidence is provided, and take a
good look at the background and history of the multiples of SETI people who are
trying to tell you why you are wrong. There is NO evidence to support any facts
other than that all data as provided to support the original claim is fake.
Everything else on this topic is 'white noise'. Also, you should note that
dozens of amateur and professional SETI sites wasted their time looking shortly
after the faked data arrived and found nothing. Stop demanding that a serious
look be taken; it was, and there was then, and is now, nothing there! Let it
go...someone is having great fun leading you around by the nose...

ps. How exactly do you know what an 'alien starship' would look like? Of course,
WE would need the data images and a detailed writeup in order to decide whether
it is a correct interpretation. If you have such a presentation, please send me a
copy. Alternatively, please point me toward the source of your information! ( I
have already seen the SOHO images, many, many weeks ago when they were posted at
the SOHO site under their normal process; a curious & interesting but
non-remarkable event. )