archive: Re: SETI Chip Cohen is NOT anon.

Re: SETI Chip Cohen is NOT anon.

Daniel Boyd Fox ( )
Sun, 1 Nov 1998 09:19:02 -0500 (EST)

Looking over this whole thing I feel I should comment.

We were involved in a game with the hoaxster. We make a move, the
hoaxster makes a move. We were at a disadvantage in that we did not know
the hoaxster's game. I suspect that the hoaxster has played this game
before. Remember "SETI pulses"? There are people who make a business of
stirring up fake contraversy(sp?). They have no interest in getting to
the truth of the matter since they would be out of business.

Daniel Fox

On Sat, 31 Oct 1998 wrote:

> Thanks for your kind comments, John.
> I think this unusual situation has tested us all beyond normal limits.
> Frankly, I am saddened by this, because in the last few months I have become
> convinced that there is at least a sizeable number of individuals that have
> the ability and dedication to do amateur SETI. It is the small apertures AND
> short integrations that are a problem; not the individuals. So to have an
> outsider do this stuff is disheartening for all.
> So you all have my support in this trying effort; I feel that now is a good
> time to show EXACTLY how good you are by putting out a comprehensive summary
> to the media to offset the CONTINUATION of bogus material on seticontact's web
> site--which now has the audacity to feature an interview with Paul Dore(!);
> ALLEGED independent confirmation(!) from someone signing GU0NHD; and other
> extraordinary comments.
> I did my duty; time for someone else to feed the media hoards.
> 73
> Chip N1IR