archive: Re: SETI RE:Being classed as a nut and the big bang question.

Re: SETI RE:Being classed as a nut and the big bang question.

Corey Ashford ( yeroca@rocketmail.com )
Sun, 18 Oct 1998 23:59:24 -0700 (PDT)

Perhaps this is a completely different topic but maybe
it's related somehow to whether or not the Universe
is open or closed. I believe that the current
thinking is
that there's only about 10% of the matter that it
requires for the Universe to be closed... so if these
two ideas are related, then perhaps the Universe is
not a black hole.

Frankly, I never really understood the fourth dimension
into which the Universe is curved because of the mass
it contains. I'm guessing it's the time dimension,
but it's never been clear to me what that would mean
for it to be closed...except that at some point the
Universe would again collapse (maybe?)

It's easy to picture it as a
spatial dimension, but time... *shrug* too weird.
Guess I'll never be a topologist!

---MarcusJohn@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 10/18/98 3:18:20 AM Eastern
Daylight Time,
> nwelstead@seti.org.au writes:
>
> > to boot. Maybe we are all inside the event
horizon of the universe and that
> > the
> > outer boundaries will never reveal themselves to
us because thay are on the
> > otherside of the horizon, with no way for us to
look outside??
> > Just a thought!!!!!
>
> I have often had this same thought. The universe is
seems to be massive enough
> to be classified as a black hole. I bet there are
other universes, inside
> their own event horizons. Just who or what might be
outside these event
> horizons? Does anybody have the clout to ask Steven
Hawkings if the universe
> is itself a black hole?
>
> John Marcus.
> KE3SW.
>

_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com