SETI bioastro: FW: [vsnet-alert 10044] Another Possible Nova in Cyg;prenova in IPHAS survey and ROSAT catalog

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2008 - 20:02:46 PDT

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI bioastro: Stonehenge dig turns up new clues"

    >From: Taichi Kato <tkato_at_kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
    >To:
    >variable_star_forum_at_yahoogroups.com,vsnet-alert_at_ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp,vsnet-alert_at_yahoogroups.com,vsnet-campaign-nova_at_ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp,vsnet-newvar_at_ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp,vsnet-newvar_at_yahoogroups.com
    >Subject: [vsnet-alert 10044] Another Possible Nova in Cyg;prenova in IPHAS
    >survey and ROSAT catalog
    >Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:22:18 +0900
    >
    > According to CBAT's Unconfirmed Observations Page, a new possible
    >nova has been reported in Cyg (mag = 7.7C).
    >
    > It is noteworthy that the prenova was recorded in IPHAS survey of
    >emission line stars.
    >
    >194301.9 +321913 (2000.0) IPHAS_J194301.98+321913.5 em R=18.174 R-I=0.651
    >R-Ha=0.631 MNRAS384,1277
    >
    > The likely ROSAT identifications:
    >
    >194301.2 +321908 (2000.0) 1WGAJ1943.0+3219 0.0247 0.15 1.26 1.06 0.42
    >obs=1993.278
    >194301.9 +321912 (2000.0) 2RXP_J194302.0+321912 0.0259P 0.97 0.14 931005
    >194302.1 +321905 (2000.0) 1RXPJ194302+3219.1 0.0260 0.98 0.10
    >
    > The object is thus potentially a nearby CV undergoing a nova outburst,
    >or was bright at the epoch of ROSAT observations (cf. V2487 Oph).
    >If the object was caught during the rise, it might become a naked-eye nova.

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI bioastro: Stonehenge dig turns up new clues"
    New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Apr 10 2008 - 20:06:30 PDT