SETI bioastro: Thaw point: 'Snowball Earth' was more a slushball

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2007 - 06:05:32 PST

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI bioastro: FW: Images of Saturn's Small Moons Tell the Story of Their Origins"

    http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Thaw_point_Snowball_Earth_was_more_a_slushball_999.html

    Thaw point: 'Snowball Earth' was more a slushball

    by Staff Writers

    Paris (AFP) Dec 5, 2007

    An extraordinary episode of global cooling hundreds of millions of years ago
    that some experts say caused Earth to completely freeze over has been
    miscalculated, a new study says.

    Instead of "Snowball Earth," the planet really became "Slushball Earth," its
    authors suggest.

    The great chill -- the longest and deepest ice age in Earth's known history
    -- happened during the late Neoproterozoic era, 850 to 542 million years
    ago.

    The evidence for the Snowball thesis comes from deep sediments in the ocean.

    Scientists look through these layers to measure levels of the isotope carbon
    13 (C13), deposited in plants through photosynthesis, as a telltale of
    Earth's climate.

    Above and below the Cryogenian layer is an abundance of C13. But the
    Cryogenian layer itself has negligible levels of this isotope.

    Coupled with other signs of intense glaciation, the explanation is that
    Earth froze over completely -- thick ice covered the oceans and glaciers
    crept down into the tropics, possibly even reaching the equator.

    The brilliant white shell reflected back the Sun's rays, and thus its heat,
    so well that the Snowball persisted for nearly 200 million years.

    Eventually the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2), welling up from
    volcanoes, escaped into the air and thankfully set the planet onto a warming
    trend, and so the icy blanket was melted.

    This scenario, first aired in 1989 and still fiercely contested, has now
    come under assault from a new angle by a trio of physicists at the
    University of Toronto, Canada.

    They have devised a computer simulation of the CO2 during the late
    Neoproterozoic that factors in the role of oxygen in the ocean.

    Progressive cooling would have allowed atmospheric oxygen to spread more
    deeply into the sea, transforming rich layers of dissolved organic carbon --
    formerly created by photosynthesis -- into CO2, they say.

    This CO2, released back into the atmosphere, warmed up the atmosphere
    through the greenhouse effect sufficiently to induce thawing, causing sea
    ice and glaciers to shrink, before a cooling cycle resumed.

    In other words, the Cryogenian would have been a milder, slushier, shorter
    affair, with ice-free seas in the tropics where sunlight would have
    generated photosynthesis, rather than a deep, long, planetary freeze.

    The ice age would not have required massive amounts of volcanic CO2 to end,
    nor would it have been delayed by millions of years.

    In a commentary, which like the study appears in Thursday in the British
    journal Nature, US geologist Alan Kaufman questions Peltier's assumption
    that levels of atmospheric oxygen were similar to today's level -- a
    relatively high 21 percent of the air.

    "Biological and geochemical evidence indicates that oxygen levels were low
    throughout most of the Neoproterozoic, with a significant rise in breathable
    air around 550 million years ago -- about the time animals first appeared on
    the planet," says Kaufman.

    The Snowball debate has a bearing on another great enigmatic episode in
    Earth's history called the "Cambrian Explosion" -- the dramatic breakout of
    biodiversity that happened after the Neoproterozoic.

    The microfossil record from this time is so emphatic that no one doubts that
    the Explosion happened.

    Critics of the Snowball theory say that such a prolonged deep glaciation
    would have destroyed all life, leaving nothing left -- or at least very
    little -- to explain this sudden, riotous diversity.

    Snowball supporters, though, argue that hardy microscopic biota survived
    unscathed during the long chill, thriving in shallow sea waters or melt
    pools on land in the tropics, or in thermal vents on the sea bed.

    When the Snowball melted, these organisms grew swiftly in size and
    complexity, becoming the new masters of the planet, they contend.


  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI bioastro: FW: Images of Saturn's Small Moons Tell the Story of Their Origins"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Dec 07 2007 - 19:14:58 PST