Re: SETI bioastro: [Bootes_Project] NOT ruling out the best scenario for the success of SETI!

From: David Ocame (docame_at_sbcglobal.net)
Date: Fri Sep 09 2005 - 16:55:32 UTC

  • Next message: David Ocame: "SETI public: Re: SETI bioastro: [Bootes_Project] NOT ruling out the best scenario for the success of SETI!"

    > I really SETI has to really look at other
    > search methods other
    > than Radio Astronomy.
    >
    > Alex

    Well, actually, no they do not HAVE to do anything,
    Alex. SETI, like any other science, is only as good or
    bad as the individual investigators involved. It is
    really up to each investigator to choose how best to
    go about his/her search. If someone thinks we should
    dig underground, well then they should do that. But,
    just because everybody doesn't dig underground doesn't
    mean their search parameters are too narrow (minded?).

    I also take issue with people who suggest that the
    radio search is no longer valid simply because we
    haven't come up with hordes of aliens chattering away
    an enormous cosmic party line. One writer even wrote
    about the "failure of [radio] SETI" (the insert is
    mine, but he was writing about the radio search. I
    don't remember the exact reference, but I will get it
    if needed). Radio SETI hasn't failed, it simply hasn't
    come up with anything yet. Forty years of on again off
    again searching (with the exception of at least one
    well known, continuous program) with no positive
    results really just means we are only in the beginning
    stages of looking. Indeed, compared to the size of the
    search space (assuming we limit ourselves to looking
    just in our galaxy), four decades isn't even a drop in
    the ocean.

    It's been said, I believe by Paul and others, that
    SETI is a multi-generational endeavor. We need to
    settle in for the long haul. We need to recruit the
    succeeding generations to come behind us to take up
    the search when you and I no longer can.

    In all this, I do not mean to suggest, Alex, that you
    are wrong. Certainly not! Fresh thinking and different
    searches are important and necessary. But add them to
    the radio search, not instead of.

    Ok, my soap box is sagging under my weight. I'd better
    get off.

    73!
    Dave

    ***********************************
    ***********************************

    Dave Ocame, N1YVV
    Awards Chair
    The SETILeague, Inc
    www.setileague.org

    Stony Creek Observatory
    FN31og
    -72.834 longitude
    41.272 latitude
    Member: The SETILeague, Inc. and,
    The Society for Amateur Radio Astronomy (SARA) and,
    The Planetary Society


  • Next message: David Ocame: "SETI public: Re: SETI bioastro: [Bootes_Project] NOT ruling out the best scenario for the success of SETI!"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Sep 09 2005 - 16:57:33 UTC