SETI bioastro: Fw: [DarlingsSpace] David Darling's Newsletter #23

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Sun Jul 18 2004 - 15:51:57 PDT

  • Next message: Dan Cook: "Re: SETI bioastro: Fw: [DarlingsSpace] David Darling's Newsletter #23"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: daviddarling123<mailto:darling_at_uslink.net>
    To: DarlingsSpace_at_yahoogroups.com<mailto:DarlingsSpace_at_yahoogroups.com>
    Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 4:46 PM
    Subject: [DarlingsSpace] David Darling's Newsletter #23

    ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
    Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70
    http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/1.XolB/TM>
    --------------------------------------------------------------------~->

    DAVID DARLING'S NEWSLETTER
    --------------------------------------------------

    Issue #23
    July 18, 2004
    e-mail:
    daviddarling_at_daviddarling.info<mailto:daviddarling_at_daviddarling.info>
    website: http://www.daviddarling.info>

    --------------------------------------------------

    Contents

    1. Meanderings
    2. Alien Intelligence
    3. Bookends

    --------------------------------------------------

    1. Meanderings

    I had a phone call a couple of weeks ago from Ted Rubenstein, a
    producer at CNN, which linked (in a roundabout sort of way) a couple
    of topics I wanted to touch upon in this newsletter - music and
    aliens. Ted is putting together a one-hour special, hosted by Miles
    O'Brien (the CNN news anchor, not Star Trek's chief engineer!), on
    the search for life and intelligence in space, to be aired this
    fall. He had some questions for me on SETI but then the conversation
    turned to the locations where they'd been shooting and the people
    they'd been interviewing for the show. One of these was Steve
    Squyres, much in the public eye recently as the principal
    investigator for the Mars Exploration Rovers. Ted said that one of
    their biggest regrets was that they hadn't been able to persuade
    Squyres to run off a few licks on the Fender electric that he keeps
    in his office. When I mentioned that I also had a Fender plugged in
    within arm's reach we got on to the subject of our favorite music,
    concerts, etc.

    Music has always been important to me in my work. I play my guitar
    as a complete break from writing. Having started with an acoustic (a
    12-string of all things) as a teenager, I moved on to classical, and
    now play electric through this amazing little gadget that lets you
    synthesize every guitar sound imaginable. It's tremendously
    therapeutic. Then, while I'm actually writing, I listen to a wide
    range of music depending on mood and what I'm actually doing. If
    it's highly original writing - like the first draft of a new book -
    then I can't do with any kind of organized sound: it's just too
    distracting. The music comes in when I'm redrafting, trying to make
    things flow better, or searching for another way to express myself.
    Then I use music almost as a thesaurus, to suggest alternatives or
    new possibilities, or to put me in a different frame of mind. One
    day it might be Pink Floyd, the next Samuel Barber or Stravinsky - I
    like a broad spectrum.

    My first major book, Deep Time, was based partly on the projected
    future adventures of the Voyager 2 probe and so, appropriately, took
    its chapter titles from the names of pieces of music carried on the
    Voyager phonograph. You can read about the record here:

    http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/V/Voyagerisrecord.html>

    and you can read the opening chapters of Deep Time here:

    http://www.daviddarling.info/works/DeepTime/DeepTime_front_2.html>

    After the book was published I was sent a couple of music CDs by
    none other than ... David Darling! One of my namesakes happens to be
    a superb improvisational cellist (he nabbed www.daviddarling.com<
    http://www.daviddarling.com/>
    before I became Net savvy!). I still listen to his albums while
    writing, and occasionally flash the disks in front of unsuspecting
    guests in a, usually futile, attempt to persuade them that I have
    hidden talents.

    My next book, Equations of Eternity, has an even weirder musical
    connection because it inspired the lyrics for the song "From Dust to
    Life" by the heavy-metal band, Hell's Destiny. More on this, and the
    scary-looking band members, here:

    http://www.metal-observer.com/articles.php?lid=1&sid=4&id=4517>

    And still on the subject of heavy-metal, I was contacted by a UK
    concert organizer whose company goes the by the name of Neutronium
    (heavy metal - get it?). He pointed out a Star Trek reference to add
    to my encyclopedia page on neutronium:

    http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/N/neutronium.html>

    and has a link to it from the company's site (as, incidentally, does
    Marathon Computers, which boasts that its desk mount for the Apple
    G5 can attach to any material - even neutronium!
    http://www.marathoncomputer.com/deskmountg5.html>).

    Most bizarre of all, following my latest appearance on Coast to
    Coast AM, Charles Maxey, an experimental recording artist, got in
    touch to ask if he could use a 5-minute sample of my voice from the
    show on one of his new tracks. How this is going to turn out is
    anyone's guess. But speaking of alien concepts...

    -------------------------------------------------

    2. Alien Intelligence

    In a recent newsletter on the new findings from Mars, I questioned
    how big an impact the discovery of simple life on another world
    would have. Of course, it would make headlines and create a lot of
    excitement for a while. But would it affect us deeply in the long
    run? I doubted whether it really would and used the seven-days
    wonder of the Martian "fossils" announcement by NASA scientists in
    1996 as an example of how the impact might be short-lived. In
    response, Rob Schleifer wrote to me with some interesting and very
    valid observations. Said Rob:

    "If microbes are discovered on Mars, I don't think it will be
    anything like the ephemeral excitement over the alleged 1996
    fossils. First of all, the fossil theory was challenged almost from
    the outset, and of course nothing was ever proved. So the initial
    reaction was a response to the POSSIBILITY of the fossils being
    genuine. But far more important, at best the fossils were an
    indication that life may have existed in the remote past on Mars,
    something that most people have difficulty relating to. [A]ctually
    finding (and seeing) living microbes TODAY on Mars is a completely
    different situation.... If life is detected on Mars, college
    students at every university in the world will be talking about this
    for decades...; and everyone else ... will also be overwhelmed by
    this. The implications will reach into every phase of life. And even
    when the initial headlines pass and people are not thinking
    specifically about this discovery, the knowledge will always be in
    the back of their minds that WE ARE NOT ALONE. And, unlike the
    fossils, every time people think about it ... they will realize that
    at the very moment they are thinking about it, these microbes are
    reproducing and multiplying on another planet and, by extension,
    throughout the universe. The comparison, then, of finding fossils
    from a long lost eon to observing living creatures today is, in my
    opinion, a very distant comparison."

    I'd love to hear other people's opinions on this. Would the
    confirmation of the existence of any kind of extraterrestrial life
    permanently change us? Obviously, it would revolutionize
    astrobiology. But would it affect us deeply - culturally,
    psychologically? I think Rob is right to argue that the fossils
    announcement wasn't a good test of this. (Was the Orson Welles
    broadcast of "War of the Worlds" in 1938 a good test of how we'd
    react to a "first contact" situation?) In any event, we'd better
    prepare ourselves mentally for the big announcement because it may
    be just around the corner. With the discovery of ammonia in the
    atmosphere of Mars, on top of the earlier news that methane had been
    found, it's getting more and more difficult (though not impossible)
    to find ways to explain these data that don't involve life.
    Personally, I think we're on the very eve of confronting the fact
    that we have cosmic neighbors - even if they are only microscopic.

    But do we share the universe with other intelligence? I'm open to
    being persuaded that finding microbial life out there would alter us
    profoundly. I don't need any persuading that the discovery of alien
    minds and civilizations, especially if they were more advanced than
    us, would change us permanently and beyond recognition.

    We may have a longer wait for this discovery. I think we'll know
    definitively about life on Mars, if it's there, by the end of the
    decade. (We may be 99% sure by the end of this year, the way things
    are going.) But high intelligence is bound to be rarer - perhaps
    very much rarer - than low life. And high intelligence will almost
    inevitably be many thousands or millions of years ahead of us. We've
    only had powered flight for a century, and radio for not much longer
    than that. We're already talking about such esoterica as quantum
    energy drives, quantum computers, antigravity, and so forth, that
    may alter science and technology beyond description. Five hundred
    years from now we'll have moved into a different technological phase
    that will make us seem like super beings by today's standards. A
    race even 10,000 years ahead of us will not, I would contend, be
    trying to communicate by electromagnetic signals or sub-light-speed
    probes. Their technology and means of comunication and travel will
    be essentially invisible to us, just as cell phone messages are
    undetectable to a primitive rainforest tribe. In fact, I'd argue -
    and I hope you'll argue back at me - that most intelligence in the
    universe will (a) not be interested in engaging us in a dialog (any
    more than we're interested in communicating with ants), and (b)
    intentionally avoid making their presence known to us (having
    adopted something like Star Trek's "prime directive"). I think we'd
    be overwhelmed and possibly destroyed by close contact with
    sufficiently advanced beings, however benign their intentions.

    Having said this, being a scientist, I'm all for SETI, both in its
    conventional and unconventional forms. I applaud the work being done
    by the SETI Institute, the SETI League, and other groups around the
    world who are doing their darndest to seek out signs of alien
    intelligence and technology. I'm happy to be a participant in Alan
    Tough's "Welcome To ETI" project, which uses the Internet to open up
    an alternative line of communication for whoever might be out there.
    I think the proposals for searching the solar system for various
    types of alien probes and artifacts are particularly intriguing. And
    who knows? Perhaps we are being closely monitored by stealth probes.
    Perhaps alien anthropologists are mingling freely amongst us at this
    very moment, studying our customs and culture. (Any ideas for how we
    might spot them, if they are?) The fact is, none of us knows; we're
    all guessing, experts and layfolk alike. And the only way we can
    move any closer to understanding what varieties of life and mind
    populate the cosmos is to go out and look. My greatest optimism for
    rapid progress is with the bottom-up, astrobiological approach,
    where we look for life in general and then refine our notions of
    more complex life based on those findings. It's my belief that we'll
    identify Mars as being biologically active in the very near future.
    And I'd be surprised if our interferometric searches of other
    planetary systems don't turn up many more signs of extraterrestrial
    life within the next two decades. Beyond that I'm much less certain
    and perhaps less optimistic. There is intelligence beyond Earth, I'm
    convinced of it. But whether we'll be able - or allowed - to detect
    it, is another matter.

    ----------------------------------------------

    3. Bookends

    Hitting the shelves next month will be the third of my encyclopedias
    for Wiley, The Universal Book of Mathematics. Read about it here:

    http://www.daviddarling.info/works/Mathematics/mathematics.html>

    Check out the front page of my website for availability of my other
    books and for the latest events in the universe at large:

    http://www.daviddarling.info>

    In May 2005 comes my next book - Teleportation: The Impossible Leap.
    More on this in the weeks ahead.

    Have a great summer everyone!

    All the best,

    David Darling

     

    Yahoo! Groups Links

    <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
        
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DarlingsSpace/>

    <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
        
    DarlingsSpace-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com<mailto:DarlingsSpace-unsubscribe_at_yahoogroups.com>

    <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
        http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
     


  • Next message: Dan Cook: "Re: SETI bioastro: Fw: [DarlingsSpace] David Darling's Newsletter #23"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sun Jul 18 2004 - 16:02:53 PDT