SETI bioastro: Fw: NASA RESEARCHERS CONSIDER MOBILE LUNAR BASE CONCEPTS

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Thu Jul 01 2004 - 13:28:38 PDT

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI bioastro: Fw: GSFC Release: WINDS MEASURED ON SATURN'S MOON TITAN TO HELP ROBOT LANDER"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: NASANEWS_at_mail.arc.nasa.gov<mailto:NASANEWS_at_mail.arc.nasa.gov>
    To: ames-releases_at_lists.arc.nasa.gov<mailto:ames-releases_at_lists.arc.nasa.gov>
    Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 1:31 PM
    Subject: NASA RESEARCHERS CONSIDER MOBILE LUNAR BASE CONCEPTS

    John Bluck
    June 29, 2004
    NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif.
    Phone: 650/604-5026 or 604-9000
    E-mail: jbluck_at_mail.arc.nasa.gov<mailto:jbluck_at_mail.arc.nasa.gov>

    Release: 04-64AR
    NASA RESEARCHERS CONSIDER MOBILE LUNAR BASE CONCEPTS

    Landing mobile bases on the moon is an idea whose time has come,
    according to a NASA researcher.

    Lunar bases that can travel on wheels, or even legs, will increase
    landing zone safety, provide equipment redundancy and improve the
    odds of making key discoveries by enabling crews to visit many lunar
    sites, according to Marc Cohen, a researcher at NASA's Ames Research
    Center, in California's Silicon Valley. Cohen recently presented his
    concept in a research paper at the 2004 American Institute of Physics
    Forum in Albuquerque, N.M.

    "If you set up a base at a fixed location on the moon, you are very
    limited in the sites of scientific interest that you can reach,"
    Cohen said. "What it comes down to is if you're landing a habitat on
    legs and wheels, it doesn't take a lot more investment to make it
    highly mobile, provided you have enough energy resources that would
    enable it to travel great distance across the moon with or without
    the crew onboard," Cohen explained.

    Linked mobile moon habitats might travel like treaded trains without
    tracks, or they could cross the moonscape in a line like Conestoga
    wagons crossing the American West. Walking or rolling habitats could
    dock to one another, or circle close together, when they reach a rest
    or research site, according to designs suggested by engineers over
    that last three decades, Cohen noted.

    In contrast, a common scenario for exploration of the moon is that
    one or more astronauts would travel to a remote site in a pressurized
    or unpressurized 'rover.' An unpressurized rover trip would only last
    hours because the astronauts would be in spacesuits for the entire
    trek. A pressurized rover could sustain astronauts for a much longer
    trip, lasting days or weeks.

    "If you are trying to conduct research with pressurized lunar
    vehicles, you run into many safety issues," Cohen said. To avoid
    life-threatening or other compromising situations that might occur
    with only one rover traveling to a remote place, a second rover might
    travel with the first.

    "But what if the second rover runs into a problem, too - the same or
    a different problem? Well, that means a third rover," Cohen said.
    "So, why not make the entire base mobile, so that all the resources,
    reliability and redundancy of the lunar mission move with the
    excursion crew?" Cohen reasoned.

    "In addition, there's risk if you land lots of immobile modules in
    one spot -- there is a danger you'll have a very long commute to a
    place of scientific interest, or can't get there. Then you've wasted
    billions of dollars. Mobile habitats greatly reduce the risk of
    finding yourself on the wrong place on the moon," Cohen added.

    Another advantage of mobile moon habitats is that they will be able
    to move out of the lunar landing zone, which could be hazardous. "The
    landing zone poses the problem that once a habitat lands on the moon,
    it is not prudent to land another vehicle within several kilometers
    because of safety concerns from ejecta in a normal landing, and in
    case of an explosive failure on impact," Cohen said.

    Cohen suggests that mobile habitats must have robust radiation
    shielding for them to be practical. "Radiation protection remains a
    challenge and a potential showstopper, as it does for all lunar base
    and rover concepts," Cohen said. However, there are potential
    shielding concepts that may well be reasonable, according to Cohen.

    The Office of Exploration Systems, NASA Headquarters, Washington,
    funds this research. Publication size images are available on the
    World Wide Web at:

    http://amesnews.arc.nasa.gov/releases/2004/lunarbase/lunarbase.html>

    and

      http://amesnews.arc.nasa.gov/releases/2004/mobitat/mobitat.html>

    More information about space architecture is on the Internet at:

    http://www.spacearchitect.org>

    -end-

    To receive Ames news releases, send an e-mail with the word
    "subscribe" in the subject line to:
    ames-releases-request_at_lists.arc.nasa.gov<mailto:ames-releases-request_at_lists.arc.nasa.gov>. To unsubscribe, send an
    e-mail to the same address with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.
    Also, the NASA Ames News homepage at URL,
    http://amesnews.arc.nasa.gov> includes news releases and JPEG images
    in AP Leaf Desk format minus embedded captions.


  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI bioastro: Fw: GSFC Release: WINDS MEASURED ON SATURN'S MOON TITAN TO HELP ROBOT LANDER"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu Jul 01 2004 - 13:41:24 PDT