SETI bioastro: Fw: Nikon digital camera captures Columbia

From: LARRY KLAES (ljk4_at_msn.com)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 13:50:18 PST

  • Next message: LARRY KLAES: "SETI bioastro: Fw: [badastronomy] Bad Astronomy Newsletter Issue #35 (Feb. 6, 2003)"

    Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:54:34 -0700 (MST)
    From: William Bottke <bottke_at_boulder.swri.edu>
    To: news <news_at_boulder.swri.edu>
    Subject: Nikon digital camera captures Columbia

               CATASTROPHE IN THE SKY
               Camera catching shuttle 'zap'
               had own glitch
               Nikon admits digital devices
               sometimes show purple
               aberrations

          http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=30904

               Posted: February 6, 2003
               1:00 a.m. Eastern

               By Joe Kovacs
               © 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

               As interest skyrockets in an
               unreleased photograph purporting
               to show the space shuttle
               Columbia being "zapped" by
               some kind of purple electrical
               phenomenon, WorldNetDaily has
               learned that the digital camera
               model which took the picture has
               been known to have its own color
               glitches.

               The
               Nikon 880
               occasionally
               produces a
               purple
               fringe
               around the
               edges of
               some
               photographs, said a top Nikon
               official.

               "It was a complaint [we heard
               from users]," said Michael Rubin,
               senior product manager for Nikon
               Inc. "Sometimes you see it,
               sometimes you don't."

               The issue of the camera's
               reliability has been raised since an
               amateur astronomer using an 880
               claims to have captured a
               mysterious image of a bright,
               multi-colored flash surrounding
               the orbiter shortly before it
               disintegrated Saturday morning.

               "Wow."

               That was veteran astronaut
               Tammy Jernigan's stunned
               reaction Tuesday night when she
               viewed the photo at the home of
               the San Francisco man who
               documented the shuttle's early
               morning re-entry into the
               atmosphere and flyover of the Bay
               area.

               "It certainly appears
               very anomalous,"
               Jernigan told the San
               Francisco Chronicle.
               "We sure will be very
               interested in taking a
               very hard look at
               this."

               Reporters from the Chronicle are
               among the few people who have
               seen the image, as the
               photographer says he won't
               release the photo publicly until
               NASA has a chance to review it.

               "In the critical shot," stated the
               Chronicle, "a glowing purple rope
               of light corkscrews down toward
               the plasma trail, appears to pass
               behind it, then cuts sharply
               toward it from below. As it
               merges with the plasma trail, the
               streak itself brightens for a
               distance, then fades."

               "[The photos] clearly record an
               electrical discharge like a
               lightning bolt flashing past, and I
               was snapping the pictures almost
               exactly ... when the Columbia
               may have begun breaking up
               during re-entry," the
               photographer originally told the
               paper Saturday night.

               A misquote concerning an early
               statement by the man led to some
               confusion about digital versus
               traditional analog images.

               "I couldn't see the discharge with
               my own eyes, but it showed up
               clear and bright on the film when
               I developed it," the astronomer
               was originally published as
               saying. But the Chronicle has
               clarified that the device is indeed
               a Nikon 880 digital camera which
               has no need of film to be
               developed.

               Nikon says unless it examines the
               San Francisco photo, it would be
               pure speculation to know if the
               "purple rope of light" has
               anything to do with any defect in
               its device.

               "Without seeing the image, it's
               like a blind person guessing what
               blue sky looks like," Rubin told
               WorldNetDaily.

               He says it's "color interpolation
               combined with chromatic
               aberration" that causes the purple
               fringe around the edges, and can
               occur when the lens is wide open,
               there's high contrast, and what
               normally would be a white line
               could appear purple.

               In an online evaluation of the
               Nikon 880 when it debuted in
               2000, photography expert Phil
               Askey of Digital Photography
               Review noted he had trouble
               re-creating the chromatic glitch,
               except in one instance.

               "We waded
               through our
               1000-plus
               'real life'
               shots
               looking for
               an